Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Hospitality in the Middle East

In the modern Western world, hospitality has taken on different connotations. Perhaps as religious traditions became uprooted from the Middle East, the primacy of this virtue—or at least its association with the compassionate treatment of strangers—was lost. Westerners tend to see receiving guests as part of creating relationships. We entertain family and friends and those whom we wish to cultivate as friends rather than opening our homes to strangers. Our care for strangers tends to be monetary rather than personal.

While there are things to be said for this approach, it lacks the moral centrality of the view of hospitality John Koenig traces to ancient Greece and the Near East. As he writes in New Testament Hospitality,"According to this tradition, which has virtually disappeared from contemporary Western culture, hospitality is seen as one of the pillars of morality upon which the universe stands. When guests or hosts violate the obligations to each other, the whole world shakes and retribution follows."

Excellent look at hospitality from the perspective of the Middle Eastern culture of the Koran and Bible by Amal Barkouki-Winter.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Why light text on dark background is a bad idea « Tatham Oddie

Why light text on dark background is a bad idea

with 9 comments

As this is a suggestion which comes up quite regularly, I felt it valuable to document some of the research I have collected about the readability of light text on dark backgrounds.

The science of readability is by no means new, and some of the best research comes from advertising works in the early 80s. This information is still relevant today.

First up is this quote from a paper titled “Improving the legibility of visual display units through contrast reversal”. In present time we think of contrast reversal meaning black-on-white, but remember this paper is from 1980 when VDUs (monitors) where green-on-black. This paper formed part of the research that drove the push for this to change to the screen formats we use today.

However, most studies have shown that dark characters on a light background are superior to light characters on a dark background (when the refresh rate is fairly high). For example, Bauer and Cavonius (1980) found that participants were 26% more accurate in reading text when they read it with dark characters on a light background.

Reference: Bauer, D., & Cavonius, C., R. (1980). Improving the legibility of visual display units through contrast reversal. In E. Grandjean, E. Vigliani (Eds.), Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminals (pp. 137-142). London: Taylor & Francis

Ok, 26% improvement – but why?

People with astigmatism (aproximately 50% of the population) find it harder to read white text on black than black text on white. Part of this has to do with light levels: with a bright display (white background) the iris closes a bit more, decreasing the effect of the "deformed" lens; with a dark display (black background) the iris opens to receive more light and the deformation of the lens creates a much fuzzier focus at the eye.

Jason Harrison – Post Doctoral Fellow, Imager Lab Manager – Sensory Perception and Interaction Research Group, University of British Columbia

The "fuzzing” effect that Jason refers to is known as halation.

It might feel strange pushing your primary design goals based on the vision impaired, but when 50% of the population of have this “impairment” it’s actually closer to being the norm than an impairment.

The web is rife with research on the topic, but I think these two quotes provide a succinct justification for why light text on a dark background is a bad idea.

(Tip: If you want to be really good, use an offset grey on a light background like #222 on #fff as it’s a bit nicer on the eyes.)

Written by Tatham Oddie

October 13, 2008 at 08:58

Posted in Design, Web Development

One blogger likes this post.

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Hi,
    I haven’t read any papers on this topic, but one thing that I know is that the reason for people to try and switch to white on black is the fact that the eyes get really tired by looking for 12+ hours at the white screen.
    So, the arguments you give here are may be relevant for short term, but what those articles say about long use?

    vvvlad

    October 14, 2008 at 08:30

  2. Black print on a slightly yellow background (see my blogsite) is very readable AND helps on the tired-eyes issue.

    BTW: Follow-Me trucks at airports are black and yellow form aximum visibility.

    Ole Phat Stu

    October 15, 2008 at 03:54

  3. Agreed with previous responses. As a developer with very bad astigmatism and keratoconus, I notice that I am only good with dark text on white background for about 4 hours before my eyes hurt.

    I can code with bright colors on black screen all day without my eyes hurting.

    Maybe the having only one forecolor has a detriment not noticed when multiple colors are used say with Netbeans editor?

    Michael F

    October 16, 2008 at 02:03

  4. An interesting angle. One question I have: assuming it’s true that nearly 50% of the population has astigmatism, wouldn’t many (most) of them have corrected it? I’ve seen an estimate that 25% of American adults are myopic to at least -1.00 diopters; does that mean “make the letters bigger?”

    References cited in the Wikipedia article on astigmatism suggest a prevelance closer to 30%. One of those references points out that refractive errors, including astigmatism, vary significantly among children in four ethnic groups, even controlling for age and sex.

    Dave Ferguson

    October 16, 2008 at 05:25

  5. Yeah, I use light on dark as well. Although, regardless of the light on dark or dark on light, I never use full black or full white.

    I’ll typically use a light gray and a very dark grey, as I find it a little easier on the eyes.

    Alex

    October 16, 2008 at 05:44

  6. [...] were hard to read. Apparently not being able to read light text on a dark background is due do to astigmatism. This was one drawback of bad eyes I have never heard of. Since all four contestants had the [...]

  7. As a CAD operator, light colors on a black background is a de-facto standard. It’s better for seeing details for longer periods of time with minimal eye fatigue.

    Which strikes me curious that MS has all but eliminated the ability to accomplish this in any of their software. See for yourself by setting your windows colors to make this occur by default – menus, text fields, title bars, and other items that should coordinate with your settings don’t, they want to be black on white, and therefore become the same color for both.

    Thank you MS for not getting the user base.

    Vince

    December 11, 2009 at 09:21

  8. I was under the impression that white on dark is easier on the eyes. I just was under the impression that staring into a bright source of light is tiresome.
    Besides some people believe that dark background spare energy. And by the size and brightness of my LCD monitor, I don’t think that is far fetched.
    It appeared logical to me that something that (supposedly) uses less power and throws less white-bluish light into your retina would be healthier.
    Also, the white, paper-like background just looks sad and depressing.
    But the thing about focus and the iris also makes sense, so I really dont know what to do now! I was all proud of having switched all my IDEs to sci-fi like dark backgrounds.

    rolfen

    August 1, 2010 at 00:16

  9. I have recently had numerous conversations about dark versus light backgrounds. While there are several arguments in favor of light backgrounds (like those listed here), the only argument I have heard against light backgrounds is this notion of “eye strain”. I have spent a fair amount of time looking for any research that supports this argument and have not found any. If anyone is familiar with research on this topic, please post it.

    presentationfacts

    September 17, 2010 at 02:10


Leave a Reply Cancel reply

I really do NOT like sites with light text on dark backgrounds. When I come across one I try the following...

1. I select the edit CSS option with one of my extensions.

2. I use another extension to turn off all styles.

3. I just leave the site.

We do not normally read light text on dark backgrounds! Please take note!

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Don’t leave learning to the young. Older brains can grow, too.

Whether it is by learning a new language, traveling to a new place, developing a passion for beekeeping or simply thinking about an old problem in a new way, all of us can find ways to stimulate our brains to grow, in the coming year and those to follow. Just as physical activity is essential to maintaining a healthy body, challenging one’s brain, keeping it active, engaged, flexible and playful, is not only fun. It is essential to cognitive fitness.

 

 

Oliver Sacks is the author of “The Mind’s Eye.”

 

Read the whole article at nytimes.com

 

Yes, there is hope for us ‘older’ folks! I have taking on a renewed interest in linguistics. —aps

Friday, December 31, 2010

How Good Is Your Password? | Faith & Tech Blog

There seems to be an ever-increasing disclosure of cases of exposed passwords. Recently it was Mozilla and Gawker (the Gawker incident exposed quite a number of websites). Laptops are stolen containing databases with this kind of information. Hacks into web servers can compromise accounts (university servers seem to be especially vulnerable). While we can keep our personal computers and devices locked up, or physically secured, our online presence is especially dependent on passwords. Whenever we are online the device we are using is vulnerable (perhaps someone will address firewalls in a future column). How secure are you? Ask yourself these questions.

Do you use a password manager? If the answer is no, then you should get one. Most password mistakes are made because we are too lazy or find it too difficult to implement unique and secure User ID and password combinations on the number of sites we visit. The built-in password managers in browsers like Firefox only offer the minimal amount of functionality you really need in a password manager. I will address password managers below.

Do you use the same User ID and password combination at more than one site? If you have a password compromized on one site you will be vulnerable on the other sites. If you use the same password on more than one banking, financial, or shopping site, change them today! If these sites will allow you to change your User ID, consider providing a unique User ID for each site. For example, while I may use apswartz for most of my social sites, I might user other User IDs where security is really important: AlanTheSwartz, Here1am, 0My1User2Name (most sites allow letters and numbers only in User IDs, but other sites may allow other characters). By using a unique User ID AND a uniquely generated password for each of these sites you are making it difficult for others to even guess your User ID effectively doubling your security.

Do you use easy-to-remember passwords that might be guessable? Please note that simply adding a number to a word doesn’t make it safe. So-called dictionary attacks prepend and append numbers to words and names when trying to crack a database file. They also mix up the cases of letters and convert words to ‘leetspeak’ in the attack. Leetspeak is simply converting letters to numbers (or numbers to letters) so that a word like Superman might look like $up3rm@n or 5up37m4n or — well you get the idea. Variations of your name, your spouse’s name, your children’s names, or birthdays, etc., always make for guessable passwords. Please remember that we are talking about guessing using sophisticated cracking software that allows you to target someone’s password using that type of information.

So, what makes for a good password? It should not be a word or combination of words or a mixture of words and numbers. It needs to be long. The longer the password, the more computing time it will take to crack it. It should include letters (upper AND lower case), numbers, and nonalphanumeric characters, such as: !@#$%^&*()-+. (No that isn’t cussing, this isn’t the comic page!). A good password looks like this: fy{Q#Caz69L8&5t.

So, what is the best way to secure our online presence? I recemmend you get a good password manager to do this for you. There are a number of excellent managers, but the one I think stands heads and shoulders over the others is LastPass.[1] I like LastPass for the following reasons. First, it works in all my browsers. Second, it works on Smartphones and computers. Third, passwords are encrypted and stored on the cloud.[2] This allows you to have access to your passwords regardless of what computer or smartphone you are using. This last item was the deal maker for me. I can change a password while using Chrome on my laptop and have immediate access to the change on my Droid phone.

Using a password manager means you only have to remember two passwords. One to log onto your computer or device and one to log into your password manager. These passwords are critical to your overall security and should be carefully thought out and implemented. You don’t even need to worry about changing this two passwords if they are secure to begin with.[3]  Here is one way to make a good, memorable password that should not be easy for others to figure out.

First, select a phrase. Don’t select your favorite phrase or one that people might associate with you,  but one you can easily remember. For example, I will use a phrase from the Bible, “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” Now I will use the initial letters and punctuation from the phrase while capitalizing the nouns (or you can choose some other form of speech or reverse the process). This will give me BatPiS,ftitKoH. Now I will tweak it a bit. I will replace the word ‘are’ with the letter ‘R’ and the word ‘for’ with the number, and replace the period with an semi-colon so it now looks like BRtPiS,4titKoG; — but I really should have at least another number, so I will make the ‘o’ a zero — BRtPiS,4titK0G; and I now have a 15 character, seeming random mix of letters, numbers, and characters. So remember this and one other password like it along with a password manager like LastPass and you are good to go. Or, you can get a website to do the work for you.[4]

- – - – - – - – - -
1. “The Last Password You‘ll Have to Remember!” http://lastpass.com/; Accessed: Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

2. “Cloud Computing,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing; Accessed: Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

3. “Change your password? Maybe not.”  http://blogs.computerworld.com/17549/change_your_password_maybe_not; Accessed: Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

4. “Hugh‘s Secure but Easy to Remember Password Generator,” http://www.hughchou.org/calc/pwgen.cgi; Accessed: Wednesday, December 29, 2010.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Texting while driving law not so straightforward - Road Worrier

... The proof is piling up to show that cell phone use is a growing hazard that we can reduce, if we'll do it.

Researchers compare phones to alcohol in their power to distract attention and delay reaction times for drivers.

According to a University of Utah study, if you're talking on the phone while you drive, even a hands-free device, you're as dangerous as a driver with a blood-alcohol concentration of .08 percent. In other words, you might as well be drunk.

The National Safety Council figures that 28 percent of all crashes involve drivers who were texting or talking on the phone.

 
I shudder to think about the times I have seen drivers reading books and newspapers while driving. I have ridden with drivers who got distracted changing CDs or radio stations. Then there was the bus driver I saw trying to steer, talk on his phone and hold a drink at the same time!

Monday, December 13, 2010

Airport Body Scanners Fooled By Human Tissue -- Airport Screening Technology -- InformationWeek

According to the report, "even if exposure were to be increased significantly, normal anatomy would make a dangerous amount of plastic explosive with tapered edges difficult if not impossible to detect."

Furthermore, the report assumes that machines will be operating at 100% efficiency, but that's unlikely, said the researchers. "For the kind of technology in use in this market, heavily influenced by number of units and budget, and little influenced by competitiveness and performance, the efficiency may easily be 50%."

What could sneak by scanners? Try a half-pound of PETN -- as they note, it's "easily picked up in a competent pat down" -- or 40 grams of PETN, which could be pancaked to the point where it's invisible to detectors. In other words, whatever else they do, don't expect full body scanners alone to stop explosives.

Lots of wasted money for expensive toys that can show a great outline of your naked body, but fairs to detects bombs.